Wednesday 25 April 2012

St Francis and the New Orders


My aim here is to give a broad idea of the Gregorian reform, the new orders that emerged and the effect this had on society.at large.
This week’s readings focused on what can be described as the ‘great upsurge of the medieval West’. This occurred from about the year 1000 onwards in which the population doubled. As a result there became an increase in land clearances and built up areas becoming clustered. In what resembled the urbanisation of the 19th century the economic upswing lead to the creation of networking towns which became economic, political and cultural meccas. This urbanisation impacted on all sectors of society from the church to the status of the people. Economic and social inequality was determined by ownership of land and buildings in town rather than strictly dependent on birth and family. There also seemed to be a trend towards liberty and perhaps away from feudalism. The changing society was reflected in the ecclesiastical world through what is known as the Gregorian reform. This reform ‘released the church society from feudal secular domination’ and aimed largely at a return to sources and to achieve the true apostolic life. It is apparent that these changes within the church were an effort to find a place amongst the evolving society and possibly to remain relevant to the people of which found themselves with new liberties. Of larger focus for this week’s readings is the emergence of new religious orders in which laymen played a greater role in religion. These orders were eager for reform within the church and were against the corrupt clergy. These orders were as much political as they were religious. Many things came from the reformation ranging from new concepts of sacraments to the scholastic revolution, demonstrating that there was indeed a great change in society.
--Dion

Monday 23 April 2012

Clarification

Clarification I:
There are no classes on campus for ATS1316 in week 8. Your posts on the Crusades and Crusade Historians post, below, constitute your 'virtual tutorial' for this week.

Clarification II:
Blogs by presenters in week 9 will go live on Wednesday. Everyone needs to read and comment on these, even if they are not presenting.

Clarification III:
For presenters in weeks 9-11:

Topic St Francis (wk 9) Crusades (wk 10) Black Death (wk 11)
Blog Post
to Kathleen
5pm Tue. 24th April 5pm Tue. 1st May 5pm Tue. 8th May
Presentation Mon. 30th April Mon. 7th May Mon. 14th May
Essay Due Fri. 11 May Fri. 18 May Fri. 25 May

Friday 20 April 2012

Important Announcement

Unfortunately the audio of the week 7 lectures have not been recorded. The slides are available, however, on both MULO and Blackboard. I am very sorry for the inconvenience, but sometimes technology does fail. I know that some of you have clashes and need to rely on the recordings. I would urge, however, those of you who can attend the lectures to do so, because that is the only absolutely guaranteed way that you have of hearing the material
Cheers, Clare

Wednesday 18 April 2012

Crusades and Crusade Historians

  [Edit: spelling corrected for Tyerman - thanks Jonathan!]
Truce between Christians and Saracens.
Matthew Paris, Chronica Maiora, Parker MS 16II, f.139v.
In lectures during week 7 Clare raised the issue of thinking about where historians are coming from when they write. I'd like us to try and incorporate this into our discussions in this week's virtual tutorial. I've provided some links that give you other people's perspectives on Christopher Tyerman, author of the chapter on the Meaning of the Crusades, and his work. There are reviews of one of his recent books by Jonathan Philips - another well-known historian of the Crusades - and Dame Janet (a.k.a. 'Jinty') Nelson, a prominent early medievalist. I've also given you a link to an interview with Dr Tyerman himself. If you can, I recommend reading through these after you've looked at Tyerman's chapter. Address the questions in the reading pack, but also consider whether Tyerman's view seems to represent a consensus; and how his views differ from or relate to those of others who have written and thought about the Crusades.

In this interview, Tyerman talks about how it is misleading and ahistorical to draw direct connections between modern wars in the Middle East and the medieval crusading movement. I agree with him on this point, and it brings me to a general matter I forgot to mention in class, which is: while modern parallels and experiences can be useful tools for helping us think about the past, we should never confuse them with historical argument itself, which always has to be based in the evidence and context of the period. I'm sure you knew this - but especially following our discussions about ANZAC cove and Canterbury it seemed a good time to remind ourselves of this point...


Urban II preaching the crusade

But back to the Crusades! The Institute for Historical Research in London runs a monthly seminar about the Crusades, so clearly there's no shortage of opinion and debate on the topic.

The same was true at the time of the very first crusade. As Megan told us a couple of weeks back, pope Urban's sermon was recorded in different versions by a range of observers. Does applying similar principles of interpretation to these reports help you think about how and why they differ? Where were these medieval writers coming from, do you think? Why were they writing? Who was in their assumed audience?
Post your thoughts and responses to these readings below by Monday evening. Then we'll be moving on to St Francis and Co.!

Tuesday 10 April 2012

Gender Roles

This week sees the first of the blogs composed by you, the students! You get to take over our online interactions, and direct our discussion from the outset. Please be considerate of your colleagues' efforts and be sure to contribute generously online and in class.
Kathleen

Emily writes:
The gender expectations of this time were that women were to run the households and to raise the children; marriage was about financial and political connections and love was something reserved for Christ. But with the rise of interest in courtly and romantic love, marriage was idealized as being a symbol of love and expression of passion, thereby altering the gender expectations of women being bought and sold as wives, but as women who were something to be desired and loved.  We’ve looked at the story of Abelard and Heloise, and another I think it would be interesting to look at is the poem about Sir Lancelot and Queen Guinevere:

Sir Lancelot and Queen Guinevere by Lord Alfred Tennyson

Like souls that balance joy and pain,
With tears and smiles from heaven again
The maiden Spring upon the plain
Came in a sunlit fall of rain.
In crystal vapor everywhere
Blue isles of heaven laugh'd between,
And far, in forest-deeps unseen,
The topmost elm-tree gather'd green
From draughts of balmy air.

Sometimes the linnet piped his song;
Sometimes the throstle whistled strong;
Sometimes the sparhawk, wheel'd along,
Hush'd all the groves from fear of wrong;
By grassy capes with fuller sound
In curves the yellowing river ran,
And drooping chestnut-buds began
To spread into the perfect fan,
Above the teeming ground.

Then, in the boyhood of the year,
Sir Launcelot and Queen Guinevere
Rode thro' the coverts of the deer,
With blissful treble ringing clear.
She seem'd a part of joyous Spring;
A gown of grass-green silk she wore,
Buckled with golden clasps before;
A light-green tuft of plumes she bore
Closed in a golden ring.

Now on some twisted ivy-net,
Now by some tinkling rivulet,
In mosses mixt with violet
Her cream-white mule his pastern set;
And fleeter now she skimm'd the plains
Than she whose elfin prancer springs
By night to eery warblings,
When all the glimmering moorland rings
With jingling bridle-reins.

As she fled fast thro' sun and shade,
The happy winds upon her play'd,
Blowing the ringlet from the braid.
She look'd so lovely, as she sway'd
The rein with dainty finger-tips,
A man had given all other bliss,
And all his worldly worth for this,
To waste his whole heart in one kiss
Upon her perfect lips.

We’ve already looked at Abelard and Heloise, but the story of Lancelot and Guinevere idealized the passion and lust that was so highly sought after with the notion of romantic and courtly love.  Throughout the early, or the low middle ages the life of many consisted of being raised by your parents, married off to secure money, political connections, more land or other materialistic acquisitive means, and then the men ran the farms or worked the land, and the women raised the children. There were slight variations throughout socio-economic groups of course, but that was a generic and largely accepted routine. Within the readings, focus on the contrasts drawn between Lady Eve (from the Garden of Eden) and the Virgin Mary. One was condemned for the downfall of man, while the other was praised with bringing the Messiah to man and how this might have changed or been affected through the concepts of marriage. This also relates to virginity, which many of Gen Y may not think all that much about nowadays, could have resulted in women’s perceived ‘value’ being lowered and fines being paid to her father as compensation back in the day.

~ ~ ~
Clare adds: 
The following are some questions which you may see as a guideline in pinpointing some aspects of this week's text. Whilst you don’t have to write out exact answers for these questions, please take time to consider each of them, and what the author/s of this week’s reading opinions are.
  • How did the ‘cult of Mary’ or the ‘cult of virginity’ influence the lives of medieval women? Did the birth of Christ, from the Virgin Mary, lift women’s lowly position in medieval society or were they still scorned as the ancestors of the first sinner, Eve?
  • What are the key determinants for marriage during the High Middle Ages? Did the Church’s views differ from that of the heads of families and clans?
  • How did the duties of wives and women differ among the classes? Did activities such as needlework and tapestry making (among the upper classes) or being a wet-nurse (among lower classes) further hinder their freedom or enhance it? 
  • It was expected that a good obedient wife would conceive and bear many children. How did this constant state of pregnancy affect women? Was motherhood a type of outlet for the medieval woman or was it just another shackle to endure?
Inline images 1
Christine de Pizan hard at work
Also, consider these quotes from Christine de Pizan. She appears to be quite a unique and talented woman. Would you agree? Is she a rare example of an intelligent woman of her time, or just one lucky enough to be granted the right to education and thus able to express her feelings through prose and text?

The man or the woman in whom resides greater virtue is the higher; neither the loftiness nor the lowliness of a person lies in the body according to the sex, but in the perfection of conduct and virtues.”

How many women are there ... who because of their husbands' harshness spend their weary lives in the bond of marriage in greater suffering than if they were slaves among the Saracens?

Finally, if you have the time (or inclination), check out episode 2 of the documentary Kathleen mentioned (http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/inside-the-medieval-mind/), as it discusses gender roles in medieval Europe, and is rather interesting.